Hair Restoration

Is the prohibition of certain substances is ridiculous? No, it's ridiculous. Propecia can be performance-enhancing effects, and he should know better. The banned substances are no secret. If the hair restoration pill that contains the banned substance then yes he should be banned. The fact that the principle use of the drug can be used to grow hair does not matter if an ingredient is banned by the IOC when the athlete or ingestion of the substance to prevent or else face the consequences. If an athlete took a medicine for an earache, and as a drug with cocaine athlete can not expect us to believe them when they say "Hey.I have pain in your ear, so I take the ear-B-Gone, I did not take cocaine, which can improve my performance, "The shooter needs a different treatment for his sore ear, one that does not contain a banned substance use. If a particular toothpaste was in the store are available and the ingredients for the mint, and bovine growth hormone has been an athlete should probably not use it because it was a growth hormone substancehe could not forbidden us to believe that toothpaste is used to whiten teeth. Athletes have access to medical information and health, they should also top of their medical team and health knowledge, they put in their bodies Olympics. If Zach Lund follicly challenged, it is the situation in another way, who's not with a medication containing a prohibited substance may look like a wig. Moreover,! A lack of hair would an athlete more aerodynamic and therefore faster.